T S Eliot didn’t like Animal Farm

Who knew? He turned the book down for Faber (where he worked) because of a perceived paucity of “public spirited pigs”. (‘Paucity’. See what I did there?) Full marks to Eliot, though, for maximum crustiness and point-missing:

In the letter, Eliot argued that Orwell’s “view, which I take to be Trotskyite, is not convincing.” … Eliot seems to imply that if Orwell’s intention is to convince the reader of the logic of Trotksyism over Stalinism, the more sensible authorial decision would be to have “more public spirited pigs” … “I think you split your vote, without getting any compensating strong adhesion from either party – ie those who criticise Russian tendencies from the point of view of a purer communism, and those who, from a very different point of view, are alarmed about the fate of small nations,” wrote Eliot.

I’m toying with getting a rubber stamp and ink set made bearing the legend ‘the more sensible authorial decision would be to have more public spirited pigs’, with which to stamp UG creative work. And, no, I’m not entirely sure what Eliot meant by that last quoted sentence either. (Presumably ‘small nations’ like, er, the USA. Or the British Empire.) [AR]

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under General reading

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s